Skip to content
ATOM PHARMA
AnalysisAnalytical science

Reading a certificate of analysis: what HPLC purity means

A certificate of analysis summarises test results for one batch. We explain what its purity, identity and content figures can document, what they cannot establish on their own, and why a single HPLC percentage is not a complete description of a peptide.

ATOM PHARMA Editorial Team7 min read

Synthetic peptides are often accompanied by a certificate of analysis: a short document reporting test results for a particular batch. The most prominent figure is usually an HPLC purity percentage. This article explains what a certificate of analysis can document, what each common result means, and why a single purity figure should not be read as a complete characterisation of the material in a vial.

This article describes certificates of analysis in general analytical terms. It does not describe the documentation or testing of any particular supplier, including ATOM PHARMA. The principles of HPLC and mass spectrometry are explained in our article on analytical methods for synthetic peptides.

What a certificate of analysis is

A certificate of analysis records the results of specified tests on one batch of material, usually alongside the acceptance criteria the results are judged against. For regulated peptide medicines, specifications cover three broad questions: identity, purity and assay, meaning the actual content of the substance. Even among pharmacopoeias, these specifications are not fully harmonised[1]. Outside regulated medicines, there is no single standard format. What a certificate contains, and how the tests were done, varies.

A certificate is therefore a summary, not the data. It reports conclusions from analyses whose methods, raw chromatograms and spectra are usually not shown.

The anatomy of a certificate

FieldWhat it recordsWhat it does not show on its own
Batch or lot numberWhich production batch was testedThat a given vial came from that batch
IdentityUsually a mass measurement consistent with the expected sequenceIsomers, D-amino acids or sequence errors of the same mass
HPLC purityShare of UV signal in the main peakMaterial that is invisible to UV detection or co-elutes
Peptide contentThe proportion of the weighed mass that is peptide, if measuredAnything, if the field is absent
Water, counter-ion, solventsNon-peptide components, if measuredAnything, if the field is absent
Date and method referencesWhen and how testing was doneStability of the material since that date
Swipe sideways to see the full table.

Chromatographic purity

In reversed-phase HPLC, the sample is separated on a column and detected, usually by ultraviolet (UV) absorbance. Chromatographic purity is the area of the main peak as a percentage of the total area of all integrated peaks. Its value depends on the method used, including the column, mobile phase, gradient, detection wavelength and integration settings[2].

Three assumptions sit behind the number.

  • Equal detector response. Using peak area as a proxy for amount assumes that every component absorbs UV light equally. In reality, impurities formed by insertion, truncation, deamidation, oxidation and other processes can respond differently from the main peptide. Assuming a relative response factor of 1 by default can overestimate or underestimate impurities[3].
  • Complete separation. Anything that elutes under the main peak is counted as the main peptide. This matters most for isomers. Compounds with the same mass-to-charge ratio are not readily told apart by mass spectrometry, so they must be separated chromatographically. Assessing main-peak purity rigorously can require a second, orthogonal separation[4].
  • Everything is detected. Water, counter-ions, inorganic material and residual solvents are measured by other methods, if at all[5]. They do not reduce a UV purity figure.

A purity percentage is therefore a relative measure of UV-absorbing, separable components under one method. It is not a measure of how much of the powder is the intended peptide.

Retention time and reference standards

Retention time is the time a compound takes to pass through the column. On its own, it is weak evidence of identity, because different compounds can elute at similar times. It becomes more informative when the sample is compared with a well-characterised reference standard run under the same conditions.

Establishing such a standard is itself demanding. A United States Pharmacopeia (USP) report describes several steps. Peptide reference standards were characterised with NMR, mass spectrometry and chromatography for identity, and with HPLC and gas chromatography for content and impurities. Their value was assigned by a mass-balance approach that integrated results from several laboratories. The authors noted that features such as chiral or isobaric amino acids may need additional techniques for full characterisation[6].

Mass spectrometry and identity

Mass spectrometry measures mass-to-charge ratio. A measured mass matching the expected sequence is good evidence that the main component has the right composition. It cannot, however, distinguish isomers that share the same mass[4]. It also cannot detect D-amino acids substituted for their natural L-forms. D-isomers can enter as impurities in starting materials, form during synthesis, and in some cases form during shelf life. Detecting them requires a dedicated chiral method[7]. Sequence errors that preserve mass may need fragmentation experiments or other orthogonal techniques to detect.

Identity, purity and content are different questions

QuestionTypical methodWhat it answers
Is this the right molecule?Mass spectrometry, sometimes with fragmentation or chiral analysisIdentity
How much of the UV-detectable material is the main peak?HPLC with UV detectionChromatographic purity
How much of the weighed powder is the peptide?Amino acid analysis, quantitative NMR, or a mass-balance calculationContent
Swipe sideways to see the full table.

A high purity figure says nothing about identity, and a correct mass says nothing about content.

Water, solvents and counter-ions

A lyophilised synthetic peptide is rarely pure peptide by mass. Counter-ions such as trifluoroacetate can remain from synthesis and purification[8]. Water and residual solvents are also usually present.

A detailed purity assignment for synthetic oxytocin illustrates the scale. Using liquid chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry, the analysts identified 21 structurally related impurities. They measured water by Karl Fischer titration, counter-ions by ion chromatography, inorganic elements by mass spectrometry and volatile organic compounds by gas chromatography. The assigned value was 796.5 mg of oxytocin per gram, meaning that about a fifth of the material's mass was something else[5]. Methods for determining content also differ in precision. A multi-laboratory comparison of HPLC assay, quantitative NMR and amino acid analysis for oxytocin found different levels of variability between laboratories[9].

Counter-ions are not always inert in experiments. Trifluoroacetate at low concentrations reduced the proliferation of cultured osteoblasts and chondrocytes. When trifluoroacetate and hydrochloride salts of the same peptides were compared, the trifluoroacetate forms consistently gave less proliferation. This led to a real effect being missed, or an antiproliferative effect being wrongly attributed[10]. A certificate that does not report the salt form leaves this question open.

When a high purity figure is not enough

Small amounts of the wrong material can matter more than the percentage suggests. In one investigation, peptides from two custom peptide suppliers gave false-positive results in T-cell assays. One peptide was found to contain about 1% by weight of an unrelated viral peptide commonly used in immunology research. That contamination was enough to produce responses that looked antigen-specific[11]. In another study, obestatin samples from five manufacturers were tested. One was a different peptide altogether, and two-thirds of the others did not meet the purity needed for experimental use[12].

Batch traceability

A certificate describes one batch at one time. Its value depends on traceability: a clear link from the batch number on the certificate to the material being used, and from the results to the methods and data behind them. Testing records the state of the batch on the date of analysis, not after later storage, shipping or handling. Recommendations for peptide standards used in mass spectrometry emphasise careful characterisation, storage and handling, and transparent documentation[13].

Summary

A certificate of analysis is a useful summary of tests on one batch, but it is not complete characterisation. HPLC purity is a relative measure of UV-detectable, separable components under a particular method. It depends on assumptions about detector response and separation. Mass spectrometry supports identity but cannot detect isomers or D-amino acids of identical mass. Neither measures how much of the powder is peptide, which requires a content determination accounting for water, solvents and counter-ions. Reading a certificate well means knowing which of these questions it answers and which it leaves open.

References

  1. 01
    Vergote V, Burvenich C, Van de Wiele C, De Spiegeleer B. Quality specifications for peptide drugs: a regulatory‐pharmaceutical approach. Journal of Peptide Science. 2009;15(11):697-710.DOI 10.1002/psc.1167PubMed 19750489
  2. 02
    Sharma N, Kukreja D, Giri T, Kumar S, Shah RP. Synthetic pharmaceutical peptides characterization by chromatography principles and method development. Journal of Separation Science. 2022;45(13):2200-2216.DOI 10.1002/jssc.202101034PubMed 35460196
  3. 03
    Kumar Kuril A. The Critical Need for Implementing RRF in the Accurate Assessment of Impurities in Peptide Therapeutics. Analytical Chemistry. 2025;97(24):12480-12485.DOI 10.1021/acs.analchem.5c02149PubMed 40499007
  4. 04
    Petersson P, Buckenmaier S, Euerby MR, Stoll DR. A strategy for assessing peak purity of pharmaceutical peptides in reversed-phase chromatography methods using two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Part I: Selection of columns and mobile phases. Journal of Chromatography A. 2023;1693:463874.DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.463874PubMed 36841023
  5. 05
    Wang S, Wu P, Li M, Huang T, Shi N, Feng L, et al. Mass balance method for SI-traceable purity assignment of synthetic oxytocin. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2022;207:114401.DOI 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114401PubMed 34656934
  6. 06
    McCarthy D, Han Y, Carrick K, Schmidt D, Workman W, Matejtschuk P, et al. Reference Standards to Support Quality of Synthetic Peptide Therapeutics. Pharmaceutical Research. 2023;40(6):1317-1328.DOI 10.1007/s11095-023-03493-1PubMed 36949371
  7. 07
    Strege MA, Oman TJ, Risley DS, Muehlbauer LK, Jalan A, Jerry Lian Z. Enantiomeric purity analysis of synthetic peptide therapeutics by direct chiral high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B. 2023;1219:123638.DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2023.123638PubMed 36857849
  8. 08
    D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, et al. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2014;101:2-30.DOI 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012PubMed 25044089
  9. 09
    Li C, Bhavaraju S, Thibeault MP, Melanson J, Blomgren A, Rundlöf T, et al. Survey of peptide quantification methods and comparison of their reproducibility: A case study using oxytocin. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2019;166:105-112.DOI 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.12.028PubMed 30640042
  10. 10
    Cornish J, Callon KE, Lin CQ, Xiao CL, Mulvey TB, Cooper GJ, et al. Trifluoroacetate, a contaminant in purified proteins, inhibits proliferation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1999;277(5):E779-83.DOI 10.1152/ajpendo.1999.277.5.e779PubMed 10567002
  11. 11
    Currier JR, Galley LM, Wenschuh H, Morafo V, Ratto-Kim S, Gray CM, et al. Peptide impurities in commercial synthetic peptides and their implications for vaccine trial assessment. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2008;15(2):267-76.DOI 10.1128/cvi.00284-07PubMed 18077621
  12. 12
    De Spiegeleer B, Vergote V, Pezeshki A, Peremans K, Burvenich C. Impurity profiling quality control testing of synthetic peptides using liquid chromatography-photodiode array-fluorescence and liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry: The obestatin case. Analytical Biochemistry. 2008;376(2):229-34.DOI 10.1016/j.ab.2008.02.014PubMed 18342612
  13. 13
    Hoofnagle AN, Whiteaker JR, Carr SA, Kuhn E, Liu T, Massoni SA, et al. Recommendations for the Generation, Quantification, Storage, and Handling of Peptides Used for Mass Spectrometry–Based Assays. Clinical Chemistry. 2016;62(1):48-69.DOI 10.1373/clinchem.2015.250563PubMed 26719571

Related research